The “Free Trade” Road to Tyranny
By William Norman Grigg
|
Source: The John Birch Society Bulletin, May 2001
|
Although
“single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a
day,” warned Thomas Jefferson in 1774, “a series of oppressions, begun
at a distinguished period, and pursued unalterably through every change
of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate and systematical plan of
reducing us to slavery.” (Emphasis Added). Jefferson’s admonition about
the conspiratorial designs of the British ministry toward the American
colonists offers an apt framework for examining the ongoing efforts of
the Insider elite to amalgamate the nations of the Western Hemisphere
as a stepping-stone to an undifferentiated global tyranny.
By
the time this issue of the Bulletin is available, a significant
benchmark in that effort — the third Summit of the Americas in Quebec
City — will have taken place. In the weeks leading up to that event,
the Bush administration announced that it would seek to win support for
accelerating the pace of negotiations to create a “Free Trade Area of
the Americas” (FTAA). At the first Summit of the Americas in Miami in
December 1994, a target date of 2005 was established for the completion
of negotiations; George W. and Company seek to finish negotiations by
2003, with full implementation of the accord to begin in 2005.
Like
his immediate predecessors, George W. Bush is seeking “fast track”
authority from Congress, which would allow the executive branch to
negotiate the trade pact without “interference” from Congress. With the
help of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) allies in congressional
leadership positions — House Speaker Tom Foley, Majority Leader Dick
Gephardt, and Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell, Democrats all —
Republican George Bush (the elder) was able to get “fast track”
authority to conclude negotiations on the so-called North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Democrat Bill Clinton picked up where Bush the
elder left off by presiding over the ratification of NAFTA and GATT —
the latter of which he accomplished with the help of his supposed
Republican nemesis (and CFR confrere), House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
Clearly, the Establishment’s campaign to consolidate the hemisphere
under Insider control has been (as Jefferson put it) “pursued
unalterably through every change of ministers,” and with utter
indifference to the party affiliations of those involved.
And
make no mistake about it: The proposed FTAA, like NAFTA, GATT, and the
European Union, would be another multinational building bloc of a
UN-dominated world order disguised as a “free trade” arrangement. One
of the clearest illustrations of this was provided during the May 1998
“World Trade Day” in Denver. The May 21st Denver Post described how the
event drew hundreds of businessmen and scores of corporations — each of
which was represented, UN-style, by a corporate banner — for the
purpose of “promoting an increasingly seamless global market.” But the
true purpose of the event, as demonstrated by the comments of then-U.S.
Ambassador to the UN Bill Richardson (also CFR), was to persuade the
assembled corporate representatives that the price of admission to this
“seamless” market was support for an empowered UN.
As reported
by the Post, Richardson’s speech included criticism of “congressional
refusal to fund the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund
— a global rescue unit for troubled economies. He criticized
congressional refusal to renew President Clinton’s so-called fast-track
authority — the power to cut trade deals without congressional
intrusion....” “We’re just losing markets when we don’t engage and
participate,” insisted Richardson. Of course, “engagement” as defined
by Richardson and others of his globalist ilk requires that our
national sovereignty be destroyed, and that American taxpayers be
plundered to enrich UN-favored political and financial elites.
Richardson
also protested that by refusing to renew Bill Clinton’s “fast track”
prerogative, Congress had “hindered plans for a Free Trade Area of the
Americas.” Clearly, the Insiders believe that with “conservative”
Republican George W. Bush now occupying the Oval Office, congressional
resistance will evaporate; one measure of the Insiders’ confidence can
be seen in the administration’s plan to move up ratification and
implementation of the FTAA.
But there is another important side
to this story. Speaking at the same 1998 “World Trade Day” event in
Denver, former Deputy U.S. Trade Representative Jeffrey Lang told the
assembled corporate heavyweights, “Your fellow countrymen in the
Americas are not persuaded” about the merits of globalization. “People
all over the world believe control over their lives is going to be
exercised by forces beyond their control” — and such skeptics are
undeniably correct.
JBS: The Undisputed Leader Lang
saw this spontaneous resistance to globalization as an unfortunate
obstacle. We must view it as a blessing and an opportunity. The JBS has
been the undisputed leader in educating the public about the true
Insider agenda behind the “free trade” charade. With the publication of
William F. Jasper’s blockbuster book The United Nations — Exposed (see
page 6 for information on how to obtain this book, while helping to
build The John Birch Society), we have a splendid new tool at our
disposal. Bill Jasper’s discussion of the Insider strategy of building
a UN-controlled world “bloc by bloc” will open the eyes of many of our
prospects who are among the millions of people who do not want their
lives to be ruled by “forces beyond their control.” If you have not yet
read the abridged version of Mr. Jasper’s chapter about the
construction of a world super-state that appeared in The New American
of April 9th (“Global Tyranny … Bloc by Bloc”), we recommend it
heartily. You will learn how and why NAFTA is set to become the
“European Union” of the Western Hemisphere.
But it’s not enough
merely to understand how this insidious campaign is being carried out;
our prospects must be invited to join in our organized, principle-based
effort to resist and defeat that campaign. This will require, in the
immediate term, that we mobilize those within our circle of influence
to oppose any congressional effort to extend “fast track” power to
George W. Bush.
|