Drug War on the West

Subscribe to Alerts

Get Informed

Prescriptions for Disaster

What can we do? First of all, what we must not do is fall for the false alternatives that are being offered by the same failed experts who have put us in our current dilemma. Those “alternatives” usually run along one of the following lines :

“Stay the course.” Keep muddling along, but muddle harder.
“Get tough.” Federalize all law enforcement and implement full-bore military-police state action.
“Legalize, decriminalize.” Remove the huge profit margins of drugs as contraband and tax them as we do liquor and tobacco.

Each of those nostrums is a prescription for utter disaster. We do not have the luxury of time to waste on more foolish social experimentation. What, then, can we do? What must we do?

First of all, we must face the truth. That is often the hardest part of any difficult task, and there truly are some very hard truths for us to face in dealing with the drug monster that has us in its deadly grip. Such as, what — or who — is the cause of the drug epidemic. To begin our search for the answer to that all-important question, let us refer you to the 1988 ABC-TV special entitled “Drugs: A Plague Upon the Land,” narrated by Peter Jennings. Mr. Jennings concluded that program with this unexpected observation:

If this is a war on drugs — and everyone from the President on down calls it that — shouldn’t it be fought like one?

If we could prove that the drug problem in the United States was directed by a Communist power, what do you think would happen then? Wouldn’t the government be mobilized? Wouldn’t the best minds in the country be enlisted to plan strategy? There’d certainly be no limit to the amount of money available to fight the war. Every institution in the country would be involved. No one would say, “It doesn’t affect me.”

Now, Jennings was not suggesting that there was a Communist power behind the drug trade. To the contrary, he was offering that scenario in such a way as to suggest that it had not the slightest resemblance to reality. He was merely using it as an example to raise an important question: Namely, why was the United States not fighting a serious war on drugs? Nevertheless, in using this example, he indirectly raised what might be an even more serious question: Namely, if there were a Communist power behind the drug trade — the Soviet Union, Red China, or Cuba, for example — who would believe it?

But the awful truth is that the scenario Jennings painted is strikingly accurate. Even more awful is the fact that the superabundant evidence supporting this scenario has been pointedly ignored and frequently suppressed by many of America’s top leaders — in both Democratic and Republican administrations — for the past several decades.

Target: USA

Our government’s role in abetting international organized crime is illustrated by the State Department’s dogmatic refusal to recognize the fact that the global narcotics trade has been a state-run business of Communist Cuba since 1961, Russia since 1956, and Red China since 1949. The consensus-forming elites in our government, media, and academia have steadfastly refused to acknowledge what overwhelming proof has made patently obvious: The United States has been targeted as an act of war and is the victim of a long-range, sustained, vicious drug offensive.

What kind of “overwhelming” evidence are we talking about? The type of credible and desirable evidence that every military strategist and every organized crime investigator would covet when engaged in a conflict with a cunning and ruthless adversary: Confessions and detailed eyewitness testimony from multiple high-level defectors; enemy documents, physical evidence, and inside intelligence obtained by one’s own undercover agents; intelligence obtained by technical means (wiretaps, aerial and satellite reconnaissance, etc.); money trails and networks tied to the adversary’s operatives; and a strategy, methodology, and pattern of behavior that is consistent with the opponent’s past strategy, methodology, and behavior.

We should state clearly at this point what we are not claiming. We are not saying that the entire global drug problem is a Communist plot, or that all (or even most) of the producers and traffickers of narcotics are motivated by Marxist-Leninist ideology and directed by Party discipline. Nor is anyone else we are aware of suggesting that kind of simplistic analysis. Nevertheless, the inescapable truth, as we shall show, is that decades ago the Leninist strategists in China and the Soviet Union devised elaborate long-range plans to use drugs as a “softening up” weapon in the World Revolution. They penetrated and took over many existing criminal syndicates and drug operations and started many of their own. They vastly increased the world output of narcotics and expanded enormously drug trafficking and marketing operations worldwide. They are operating them still.

China’s Drug Connection

As early as 1928, Chinese Communist leader Mao Tse-tung initiated opium cultivation at his first major guerrilla base constructed in Kiangsi. His orders to his cadres at the time were to use the opium to “trade for supplies and poison [drug] the white areas.” In this instance, the term “white” was used in the classical Bolshevik sense, to refer to the areas controlled by the non-Reds. So, very early on, the Red Chinese developed the drug weapon for a dual purpose: to raise funds or use as barter; and to morally undermine the opposition. After capturing a region, Mao would outlaw use of all narcotics and bring all opium production under Communist control, making it exclusively an instrument of the state for use against its enemies.

After gaining control of all of mainland China in 1949, Mao rapidly expanded his export of heroin to Japan, all of Asia, and the United States. The supervision of China’s narcotics operation throughout the 1950s and 1960s was entrusted to Mao’s henchman Chou En-lai. During the Korean War, both the Soviets and the Red Chinese assisted the North Korean Communists and utilized drugs as a weapon in that conflict. The Reds used drugs in a two-fold capacity: to undermine the effectiveness and morale of the GIs at targeted bases; and to experiment on captured prisoners of war.

Following the Korean War, the Red Chinese fine-tuned their drug strategy against French soldiers — with devastating effect — during the French Indochina War. And that was the warm-up for their major drug offensive against the U.S. during the Vietnam War. In 1958, as U.S. military personnel began to increase in South Vietnam, Comrade Chou En-lai told the Party faithful in Wuhan:

Every one of you must awake to the fact that the war in Vietnam is likely to escalate and US imperialism has determined to fight against our revolutionary camp by increasing its military force in Vietnam.... From the revolutionary point of view, the poppy is a great force to assist the course of our revolution and it should be used.... By exporting large quantities of morphine and heroin, we are able to weaken the U.S. combat force and to defeat it without fighting at all.

Harry Anslinger, the U.S. Commissioner of Narcotics, worked tirelessly throughout the 1950s to expose the danger. The mafia, he repeatedly pointed out, was not the biggest drug pusher. By far the biggest drug dealer was Red China. But after Anslinger retired in 1962, the pro-China forces at the State Department spiked most information concerning China’s drug operations.

In 1971, Mohammed Heikal, a publisher and confidant of Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, published The Cairo Documents, a book in which he reported a conversation that had taken place between Chou En-lai and Nasser in 1965. Chou told his fellow revolutionary:

The more troops they [the U.S.] send to Vietnam, the happier we shall be, for we feel we shall have them in our power, we can have their blood.... Some of the American soldiers are trying opium, and we are helping them. We are planting the best kinds of opium especially for American soldiers in Vietnam. We want them to have a big army in Vietnam which will be hostage to us and we want to demoralize them. The effect which this demoralization is going to have on the United States will be far greater than anyone realizes.

In March 1970, John E. Ingersoll, director of the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, told a House subcommittee on appropriations that China’s Yunan Province was one of the principal sources of the flood of heroin that was entering the West Coast of the United States. Drawing on massive intelligence from a wide spectrum of sources, the CIA drew a map of the “Golden Triangle” area of Asia, the main heroin-producing region in the world (see map on preceding page). However, the map was sent to the White House’s Ad Hoc Committee on Narcotics, chaired by Henry Kissinger, and when it emerged it had been altered to exculpate Kissinger’s friends in Peking. Moreover, Kissinger stopped reconnaissance overflights of Chou’s opium operations in Burma to avoid endangering dйtente with Red China. Selling the fiction of a friendly and changing China, the Nixon administration turned a blind eye to the PRC’s escalating drug business.

Marine General Lewis Walt was one of many U.S. officials who tried to sound the alarm but were ultimately muzzled. In testimony before the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee in 1972, Walt stated:

In June of 1970, immediately after our Cambodian incursion, South Vietnam was flooded with heroin of remarkable purity — 94 to 97 percent — which sold at the ridiculously low price of first $1 and then $2 a vial. If profit-motivated criminals were in charge of the operation, the price made no sense at all — because no GI who wanted to get high on heroin would have batted an eyelash at paying $5, or even $10. The same amount of heroin in New York would have cost $250. The only explanation that makes sense is that the epidemic was political rather than economic in inspiration — that whoever was behind the epidemic wanted to hook as many GIs as possible, as fast as possible, and as hard as possible.

Then as now, it was not so much a problem of demand (as so many “experts” insist), but an increase in consumption driven by supply. General Walt made no bones about the fact that the “whoever” behind the epidemic was China. Walt was appointed to a presidential commission on drug trafficking in Vietnam, but the commission’s report was classified and suppressed. The general later confided that the order to keep silent about China’s role was the most damnable order he had ever received.

Soviet Connection

Meanwhile, the Soviets were also well into a major expansion of their global narcotics operation. Although there are other sources of information on this topic, we are especially beholden to one man, the late General Major Jan Sejna, for the most detailed and invaluable knowledge about this strategic threat. General Sejna remains, to my knowledge, the highest positioned Soviet Bloc official ever to seek political asylum in the West. Besides being Secretary of Czechoslovakia’s powerful Defense Council, Gen. Sejna was also Military Chief of Staff and a member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, the National Assembly, the Presidium, the Kolegium, and the Administrative Organs Department. He was a top-level, decision-making Party official who met regularly with the highest officials of the Soviet Union and other Communist countries. He participated in many of the most important decisions of the Cold War and was present during the inception, planning, and implementation of Soviet narcotics trafficking operations. Over the course of nearly 30 years, from his defection in 1968 to his death in 1997, his information proved to be of extraordinary quality. Lieutenant General James Clapper, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, stated that Sejna had “provided reliable information to the U.S. intelligence community for many years.”

Sejna provided detailed data on how Soviet intelligence services — not only the KGB but the GRU (military intelligence) — went into the drug business in 1956. They then helped Cuba get into the trade in 1960. The Cuban and East European intelligence services, operating as subsidiaries of Soviet intelligence, had established massive narcotics production and distribution organizations throughout Latin America by 1965. The massive cocaine flow into the United States is mainly the result of Soviet intelligence surrogate operations.

In 1960 the Soviets tested various drugs on prisoners and concluded that cocaine was the wave of the future — a “Pink Epidemic,” as they termed it, combining the white plague (cocaine) with the red plague (Communism). The Soviets set about to build dedicated cocaine trafficking networks, centered in Bolivia, Peru, and Colombia. They gave the Cubans the task of learning existing production techniques. Tasked to help the Cubans modernize production techniques, the East Germans developed methods so efficient that one factory could produce more than three times what was then the total cocaine output of Peru, Bolivia, and Colombia. The surrogate Soviet narcotics operation came on line in 1967, which is almost precisely when the United States experienced a massive explosion of cocaine use.

Integral to the Soviet global drug strategy was a plan to infiltrate all indigenous organized crime syndicates and to establish new Soviet Bloc-sponsored and -controlled crime organizations throughout the world. The benefits are obvious. Existing criminal syndicates have what the revolutionists can put to good use: information on corrupt politicians, judges, military officers, police officials, bankers, and businessmen; established channels and experience in smuggling; and entree to a ready-made underworld that can facilitate the spread of their drug products. Another integral part of this effort was the sponsoring of terrorist groups to destabilize the targeted countries and prepare a revolutionary environment.

The Czechs and Cubans collaborated closely, under Soviet tutelage, to penetrate Latin America and establish an organized crime network. In this regard, Sejna worked directly, on a number of occasions, with Raul Castro, Fidel’s brother and Minister of Defense, to develop the drug/organized crime/terrorist operations. Their efforts were wildly successful, especially in Colombia, Mexico, and Panama.

General Sejna’s information has been validated by many means, including corroborative testimony from defectors from Cuban intelligence (DGI), the Nicaraguan Sandinista regime, and the drug cartels in Colombia, Panama, and Mexico. DGI defector Mario Estevez Gonzalez, for instance, told a congressional committee in 1983 that he had been ordered “to load up the United States with drugs.” DGI officer Rene Rodriguez-Cruz has stated that, according to Fidel Castro, “drugs are the best way to destroy American society without troops or guns.” DGI Major Florentino Aspillaga Lombard has confirmed the long-term, personal involvement of the Castro brothers in the drug trade and has noted that it would be impossible for these operations to have been carried out without the personal approval of Fidel.

Nicaraguan intelligence officials Alvaro Jose Baldizon and Roger Miranda Bengoechea have provided insider information connecting the top levels of Castro’s narco-terrorist operation to top Sandinista leaders Tomas Borge and Umberto Ortega. Cuban intelligence official Gerardo Peraza has confirmed Gen. Sejna’s information that the Cuban DGI is completely subservient to the Soviet KGB (now Russian FSB). Additional defectors and mountains of evidence have proven beyond reasonable doubt that Castro and his Soviet/Russian masters are neck deep in the global drug offensive. Fidel attempted to dodge the damning evidence over a decade ago by arresting and executing a few subordinates and claiming that their drug activities were rogue operations. None but the willfully blind or hopelessly gullible (and, unfortunately, there is an abundance of each) bought that story then. And since that time, more evidence has continued to pile up proving that the Moscow-Havana drug cartel is as active as ever.

Evidence Ignored

All of the aforementioned information — and much more besides — has been available to American government officials for many years. They have pointedly ignored and suppressed it, and successfully prevented others from making it more well known. Some of them feign ignorance, asking: “Although the Russians, Cubans, and Chinese and their surrogates may have been involved in the past, is there evidence they are still involved today?”

Yes, there is abundant evidence of the continuity of the Red drug strategy. Mao’s Communist heirs in China have vastly expanded their drug trade. The KGB/GRU and their subsidiaries are alive and well as ever, though they have undergone some cosmetic reshuffling and name changes. Their drug trafficking operations have escalated dramatically and are more open now since they are carried out by front organizations which our government obligingly refers to as the “Russian mafia,” the “Dominican mafia,” the “Haitian mafia,” etc. Thanks to the protected sanctuary that our government’s “Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil” policies have given them, the Red mafia dons can “hide in plain sight,” as the saying goes.

How else does one explain the astounding fact that notorious drug lords, such as Jorge Cabrera (Cuba), Grigori Loutchansky (Russia), and Ted Sioeng (China) have not only had unparalleled personal access to the White House during the current Clinton-Gore dominion, but their associations with, and contributions to, the President have caused barely a temporary ripple of concern about the potential national security implications? Certainly there have been no serious attempts by the media sleuths to search out and expose the connections of these criminals to the strategic Red drug trade.

Cabrera, you may recall, got caught in 1996 bringing three tons of cocaine into the United States. Cabrera, reportedly, supplied federal prosecutors with evidence of “large scale drug-dealing by the Cuban government.” He was certainly in a position to have that evidence, having been one of Castro’s privileged drug merchants. But the Clinton Justice Department locked up Cabrera’s evidence as well as Cabrera. Russian mobster Loutchansky, another Clinton financial angel, headed Nordex, a KGB front corporation infamous for international drug trafficking and arms smuggling operations. San Won “Ted” Sioeng, one of the largest illegal donors to Clinton’s DNC political slush fund, is an agent for Red China and a “business partner” of Cambodian drug kingpin Theng Bunma.

The Clinton administration pretends to have a serious effort underway to interdict drug shipments from Colombia. A major part of this effort is the Joint Interagency Task Force (JITF) headquartered at Bone Key, Florida. A report by the JITF in early 1998 offers the typical Clinton viewpoint on “Colombian” narcotics traffic in Cuban airspace and Cuban territorial waters. The report declared that, during the previous six months of 1997, 39 drug flights had passed through — or “near” — Cuban airspace, while Cuban territorial waters were used for many drug shipments. Nevertheless, the Clintonites accepted Castro’s absurd assertions that he was doing everything possible to stop these “unauthorized” incursions by drug smugglers.

Representative Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-FL) was decidedly more credible. He charged: “The participation of the [Castro] tyranny in narco-trafficking has not diminished, but has increased. And the Clinton Administration continues systematically covering up that participation in spite of the fact that the North American intel community knows the details of said participation very well.”

Strategic Deception

Space does not permit us to deal here with the larger issue of Soviet long-range strategic deception, of which the drug offensive is a key part. Over the past ten years, the Soviet strategists have succeeded in pulling off the most spectacular deception in history. They have convinced virtually the entire world that the once-feared Evil Empire is no more, that Communism has collapsed, that, having won the Cold War, we can now rejoice and relax. But it is a lie, an elaborate, deadly delusion — as has been very ably demonstrated in the terrifyingly accurate analyses and forecasts provided by KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn. In his book New Lies for Old (which was completed in 1980 and published in 1984), Golitsyn uncannily predicted, among other things, the emergence of a Gorbachev-style “reformer” who would preside over the dismantling of the Berlin Wall and the “liberalization” of the Soviet empire.

Having carefully studied Soviet long-range deception strategy for many years — from both the inside and the outside — Golitsyn is uniquely qualified to assess developments in the “former” Soviet Union. No other observer has come remotely close to matching the accuracy of his analyses. Golitsyn has repeatedly warned that the Soviet “collapse,” with its attendant upheaval and apparent changes, is a stupendous deception designed to lure the West to its destruction. His 1995 book, The Perestroika Deception, by far the most reliable assessment of developments in “post-Soviet” Russia, leaves little doubt that beneath the surface mask of turmoil and “reform,” there runs a continuity of leadership and control. The Party, the bureaucracy, the military, the police and intelligence services — the essential instruments of Communist power — all remain intact, though labels have been changed and chairs have been shuffled.

The indisputable continuity of the drug offensive, in all of its Soviet, Marxist-Leninist features, adds powerful support to Golitsyn’s thesis. The recent elevation of Vladimir Putin to Prime Minister and President should dislodge all illusions about any “break with the past” in Russia. A career “Chekist” in the KGB, Putin headed Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB), the domestic successor organ to the KGB, before becoming Prime Minister. Clearly, we are still facing the same old enemy.

But America’s leaders refuse to acknowledge that fact. They insist, instead, that we must continue to send billions of American tax dollars to the “reformers” in Moscow, even as those “reformers” return our favors with ever larger shipments of drugs. Worse still, our policymakers continue to insist that our law enforcement and intelligence agencies must share information and expertise with their “former” Communist counterparts, in order to help them “fight” their organized crime syndicates. Thus, we are helping our enemies always to keep several steps ahead of our own law enforcement and intelligence efforts.

What We Must Do

The hard truth is this: The war on drugs has not failed; it has never really existed. Like the Korean War and Vietnam War, it has been a “no-win war,” with “rules of engagement” treacherously crafted to cripple our own forces and protect the enemy. As a consequence, what measures our government has taken have been irrelevant and ineffective — or even counterproductive. The United States has been targeted as an act of war, and is the victim of a sustained offensive. The first order of business of any credible response is to recognize and name the enemy, and to sever all relations with, and stop all aid to, that enemy. If we are unwilling to make that first step, it is pointless to continue the pretense that we take this deadly war seriously.


			© 2004 http://www.stoptheftaa.org/